Heated run-off could turn into philosophical 'race'

Chris Chavez speaks against hatred visiting the Cal State Long Beach campus in November 2007



A campus rep with venomous tendancies
(click on picture to view a leader in action)

The recent Associated Students, Inc. student government elections were mostly positive. Not much in the way of the negative campaigning demonstrated by presidential candidates senators Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton was visible during the Cal State Long Beach battles, except for the few campaign violations settled by the rules committee.


The unsettled race for ASI vice president, while seemingly optimistic, has begun an online flow of abusive name-calling and vitriolic accusations among supporters and detractors of the two run-off candidates, Christopher Chavez and Jason Aula.


Negative charges about each candidate have been popping up in the CSULB forum on MySpace. Many of the comments in the ongoing joust over who the best candidate may be involve racially-toned rhetoric.


One message from a Chavez supporter with the user name “Guido” calls Aula a “known Internet troll” and calls on other supporters to join him in “a fight for free and good government against the forces of idiocy and incompetence (and Jason’s resources in these areas are inexhaustible).”


One comment from “Mike” — claiming to be Aula’s “political advisor/strategist” — takes a direct attack on Chavez. He writes that Chavez isn’t fit to fill the seat because of his involvement in the La Raza Student Association, a group Aula has consistently in the past tried to evict from campus. “Mike” even ventures as far as to write that La Raza is a “latino supremacist organization.”


The hostility between both candidates’ supporters apparently emanates from the November 2007 visit to CSULB by Minuteman Project co-founder Jim Gilchrist.

Now for some brief 'non-racist' iconic amusement

As the president of the Conservative Students Union, Aula invited the controversial Gilchrist to speak on campus. The reaction among most of the CSULB Latino community was to reject Gilchrist for its perception that the Minutemen promote racially-motivated hatred and bigory against Latino people as a whole.


While Aula’s conservative champion spoke inside the near empty Beach Auditorium, the hastily formed ad hoc Campus Coalition Against Hate mustered an array of speakers and a large crowd denouncing Gilchrist’s organization. Chavez was one of the student speakers against Gilchrist’s visit.


To add to the confusion, several of Aula’s past supporters, who ask to remain anonymous, question his commitment to conservative values. Aula is a campus organizer for Tuition Relief Now, which has on its agenda pushing legislation to tax millionaires to pay for rising tuition costs — a standpoint seen by many as being far left of conservatism.


Other Aula advocates have surreptitiously accused Chavez and his supporters of removing Aula’s campaign lawn signs, a charge Chavez vehemently dismisses as false.


As the run-off this week emerges, it will be interesting to see how voters decide on which candidate should be the one projecting the image of our university, and whether or not the winner will be a positive or negative public figurehead and student representative.

Setting futile threats of litigation, cultural insensitivity, academic sloth and perceptual ignorance aside, I hold no personal animosity against either candidate, ahem.

Believed to have been posted on MySpace by one of the vice-presidential candidates.